A confusion of courts

Medieval robbersI looked briefly at courts in my post here. However, now we have reached Henry II it is time to look at bit more closely at the situation he faced early in his reign.

The problem was largely due to the existence side by side of the old pre conquest courts and the new courts and ideas brought over with the Normans.

Courts galore

Here is a list of the main types:

  • The vill courts enforced the village by-laws. These were small humble courts and often got subsumed into the more important courts later
  • The manor courts were the landlord’s private estate courts which dealt largely with matters relating to unfree tenures of his peasantry
  • The hundred (or wapentake) courts dealt with petty crime in the local area
  • The Shire courts dealt with more serious crime, tort and pleas of debt
  • The Borough courts had the same functions within townships, according to their charter or incorporation
  • The Ecclesiastical courts dealt with ‘causes which concern the cure of souls’ such as matrimonial and testamentary matters as well as cases against the clergy (the subject of the Becket problem later in the reign)
  • The Kings Court, which met wherever the King was, was the greatest court in the land and was where his tenants in chief brought their pleas. But it was also a court for enforcing the King’s rights, as well as acting as a supreme court of appeal

Courting confusion

It sounds nice and neat written like that, but in fact it was highly confusing. The jurisdiction of the different courts was unclear. This caused problems, for example defendants could delay matters endlessly by prevaricating and raising jurisdictional queries.

Attempts at clarification failed miserably, the best (according to Warren) being Glanville writing about litigation relating to land:

Such pleas are tried in the courts of lords, in accordance with the reasonable customs of those courts, which are so diverse and numerous that they cannot readily be reduced to writing

This coupled with the fact that the medievals were not big on paperwork (few other then the clergy could read or write) and frequently looked to unsatisfactory ordeals for proof, made ‘justice’ often illusory.

Ameliorating aspects

Although none of this was good, not all was gloom and doom. Warren suggests that the reports may make things appear worse than they actually were in practice as they were largely taken from monastic records.

Monasteries were in a separate class of litigant. They often had no alternative but to litigate, and as they held property for posterity, they were reluctant to accept compromise.

Having a strong minded King was also an advantage as they could often cut through the confusion and sort things out. As Warren says, rather tongue in cheek:

They were highly conscious of the prerogative of Kingship, and discharged its duties more vigorously than many Anglo-Saxon kings, who did not have to try so hard to prove that they were truly kings.

As we will see, this all changed during the course of Henry II’s reign. However before we move into considering the changes, it is time to look at an actual case.  Which is the subject of the next post

The medieval robbers picture is wikipedia commons

Please feel free to add a comment. All comments are moderated but this is just to make sure no spam gets through.

There are no comments yet. Be the first and leave a response!

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

CommentLuv badge
This site is using OpenAvatar based on
Trackback URL http://www.historyoflaw.co.uk/confusion-of-courts/trackback/
The Norman posts
What the Normans did for law in England

Looking back of over the Norman period and considering what impact they had on the English legal sys[more]

Westminster Hall

Westminster Hall has over the past 900 years held a central place in the life of the nation. It was [more]

Cadfael and law in the reign of Stephen

The Cadfael books cast a light on law in the reign of Stephen as well as the political history of th[more]

Oaths and Ordeals

Ordeals by fire and water and trial by battle - how they were used and descriptions of the events [more]

Sheriffs in Norman times

Introducing the office of Sheriff, an important one in English legal history. We will be looking at[more]

Writs, law and the nature of lawyer DNA

There is a big difference between law now and in Norman times which this post covers, along with som[more]

Custom and courts before and after the conquest

Looking at how England was divided for administration before the conquest and the three levels of co[more]

Henry I – The Lion of Justice

Taking a look at Henry I, what he was like and what his reign meant for the country. Henry I was a [more]

The Domesday Book

The Doomsday Book has been called Britain s greatest treasure. It is certainly unique and has been[more]

The Lord of the Manor

In this post, I am going to take a look at the lower end of the feudal system. The end that you and [more]

The Estates of Man in Norman England

Taking a quick look at the different levels of society and their names. If you want to know about K[more]

The Kings Demesne

‘Demesne’ is the word for land a lord keeps for himself. This post looks at the land kept by th[more]

Norman Barons: Writs and Relief

Here we look at the ‘head lessors’, the Barons. There was a massive change at this level of soc[more]

Landlord and tenure

This was the very first history post, and looks at the word ‘landlord’ and what it means, and al[more]

The Angevin posts
The Constitutions of Clarendon and the Becket affair

If anyone knows anything about the reign of Henry II, they know about the Beckett affair. About the [more]

Towns in medieval England

Medieval towns and cities or boroughs, would have a charter from the King, Lord or Bishop/Abbot gran[more]

Medieval slavery and unfree villeinage

Slavery was by no means absent from Medieval England. Whether villeins were the equivalent of slave[more]

The Kings courts and the start of the common law

Looking at how the rise of the Kings Courts lead to a reduction in the power of the lords to decide [more]

The petty assizes and the development of the jury system

The petty assizes were the new forms of action designed to maintain the status quo - the writ of nov[more]

The General Eyre and the Court at Westminster

In my last post I said I was going to be looking the new forms of action developed by Henry II, but [more]

The Writ of Right and the start of Henry II’s legal reforms

Henry II was responsible for many important legal innovations. For example land disputes now had to[more]

Battle Abbey v. Gilbert de Balliol

Here we have an example of actual 12th century litigation - the long drawn out case of the Abbey at [more]

A confusion of courts

I looked briefly at courts in my post here. However, now we have reached Henry II it is time to look[more]

The Cartae Baronum of 1166 and the Elephant

How the survey of 1186, known as the Cartae Baronum, allowed Henry to claim more under this feudal d[more]

The Exchequer in the time of Henry II

A discussion of the workings of the Exchequer in Henry IIs time, and the duties of the sheriffs, tog[more]

The Kings household and the administration of government

Looking at how the members of the Kings household, such as his Chaplin and chamberlains, were involv[more]

Feudal incidents

The incidents which went with the feudal system are the real reason why it lasted so long, This pos[more]

Crowned King of England

Looking at the coronation of Kings and considering if this is where they get their legal authority [more]

The Young King Henry II

Introducing King Henry II, a king who ruled for 35 years and who had a profound influence on the gov[more]